The Way this Legal Case of a Former Soldier Regarding Bloody Sunday Ended in Not Guilty Verdict

Youths in a tense situation with military personnel on Bloody Sunday
Protesters in a confrontation with army troops on Bloody Sunday

Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as among the most fatal – and significant – occasions in thirty years of conflict in Northern Ireland.

Within the community of the incident – the legacy of that fateful day are displayed on the walls and seared in collective memory.

A public gathering was organized on a wintry, sunny afternoon in Londonderry.

The demonstration was opposing the policy of detention without trial – detaining individuals without trial – which had been implemented in response to three years of violence.

Father Daly displayed a white cloth stained with blood as he tried to shield a assembly carrying a young man, the injured teenager
Father Daly waved a bloodied fabric while attempting to shield a group moving a teenager, the fatally wounded youth

Soldiers from the elite army unit killed 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and remains, a overwhelmingly Irish nationalist community.

A specific visual became particularly prominent.

Pictures showed a religious figure, Fr Edward Daly, displaying a bloodied white handkerchief in his effort to defend a crowd moving a young man, the fatally wounded individual, who had been fatally wounded.

News camera operators recorded extensive video on the day.

Historical records includes Father Daly informing a journalist that soldiers "gave the impression they would fire in all directions" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no reason for the gunfire.

Protesters in the district being marched towards custody by military personnel on Bloody Sunday
Individuals in the neighborhood being directed to arrest by military personnel on Bloody Sunday

This account of what happened wasn't accepted by the first inquiry.

The first investigation concluded the military had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the peace process, the ruling party established a new investigation, in response to advocacy by family members, who said Widgery had been a cover-up.

During 2010, the conclusion by the inquiry said that generally, the soldiers had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the individuals had presented danger.

At that time head of state, the Prime Minister, apologised in the government chamber – saying killings were "without justification and unacceptable."

Relatives of the casualties of the Bloody Sunday fatalities march from the neighborhood of Londonderry to the municipal center carrying photographs of their family members
Kin of the casualties of the Bloody Sunday fatalities march from the district of Londonderry to the civic building carrying photographs of their loved ones

The police began to investigate the matter.

An ex-soldier, identified as the defendant, was charged for homicide.

Indictments were filed regarding the fatalities of James Wray, twenty-two, and twenty-six-year-old William McKinney.

The accused was also accused of attempting to murder Patrick O'Donnell, Joseph Friel, more people, another person, and an unnamed civilian.

There is a judicial decision maintaining the veteran's identity protection, which his legal team have argued is essential because he is at danger.

He stated to the Saville Inquiry that he had only fired at persons who were carrying weapons.

This assertion was disputed in the concluding document.

Material from the inquiry was unable to be used directly as evidence in the legal proceedings.

During the trial, the veteran was shielded from sight behind a protective barrier.

He made statements for the initial occasion in the proceedings at a proceeding in that month, to reply "innocent" when the allegations were presented.

Family members and allies of those killed on that day hold a banner and photographs of those killed
Kin and supporters of the deceased on Bloody Sunday hold a banner and images of those killed

Relatives of those who were killed on Bloody Sunday travelled from Derry to the courthouse daily of the trial.

One relative, whose sibling was killed, said they understood that attending the case would be difficult.

"I remember everything in my mind's eye," John said, as we walked around the main locations mentioned in the trial – from the street, where the victim was fatally wounded, to the adjacent the area, where James Wray and William McKinney were died.

"It even takes me back to where I was that day.

"I participated in moving the victim and put him in the medical transport.

"I went through the entire event during the evidence.

"Despite experiencing everything – it's still valuable for me."

James Wray (left) and Another victim (right) were part of who were died on the incident
Sean Lee
Sean Lee

Tech enthusiast and business strategist with over a decade of experience in digital transformation and startup consulting.